![]() We can also see that the polygon which joins the footpads of the lander is irregular. If we can see the four footpads (with an unequal luminosity) we can only see a leg of the lander yet it is in a part which is as shadowed as the rest of the lander. The lander has no definite shadow the shadow is all around it. This is another LRO photo of the Apollo 12 landing site. Someone has told me that it was not the shadow of the LM but the one of the other astronaut but, in that case, what is the shadow we see near the shadow of the photographer's left leg? On the satellite photo, the ALSEP is at some distance from the Lem.īut on this Apollo photo (AS12-47-6918), it is quite close to it we indeed can see the shadow of the top of the lem on the extreme left. We can see two holes that we can't see on the satellite photo, at least oriented the same way relatively to Surveyor. Surveyor is not located at the same place relatively to the hole than on the satellite photo (on which it is close to the edge of the hole). NASA claims that this part of a satellite photo shows the remains of the material of Apollo 12 In reality the lander is not so circular. We cannot see the fourth footpad, but we can see the leg it is attached to (at least partially). We can see three footpads of the lander (circled in red), but not the legs they are attached to. We first can see that the lander has no definite shadow the shadow is all around it. This is another LRO photo of the Apollo 11 landing site. Here is a panoramic of this crater reconstituted with two photos (AS11_50-5955 and AS11_50-5957) We can't find the same crater near the lem on the satellite photo. Not far from the lem, we can find a crater on the Apollo photos (here AS11-40-5955). In fact we can see a hole near the lem on the satellite photo, but it nothing looks like the hole on the Apollo photo, and nowhere it can be found on the Apollo photos. Near the lem, we can see a hole on an Apollo photo (AS11-40-5861) but we don't see this hole on the satellite photo. Where are these holes on the satellite photo, I can't see them? Near the lem, on a photo of Apollo 11 (AS11-37-5469), we can see a set of holes I have circled. The photo on the left of this double view is extracted from a video of Apollo 15 after the ascending stage of the lem has left the moon the photo on the right is a close-up of the supposed remaining part of the lem on a LRO picture (the white we see comes from an arrow pointing at the lem) the shadow we see on the LRO picture doesn't correspond at all with the shape of the lander moreover, the shadow of the lander should be not be so much longer than wide, except if the sun is extremely low, razing the ground but in that case the holes we see on the LRO picture would not be partially lit, they would appear completely blackened. There can't be two lems, so what is it the shadow of? Someone has told me that what Nasa shows as being the lem can only be the lem because of the shadow it creates.īut, on this photo, I have also circled something which also creates a shadow which looks like the shadow of the "lem". NASA claims that this part of a satellite photo shows the remains of the Apollo 11 lem (descent stage). We are going to see these photos, and in what they are incoherent. Nasa has recently released satellite photos which have been taken by the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) on which she claims that Apollo material can be seen.īut in fact, once again the NASA engineers have played the sabotaging resistants by introducing incoherences into these photos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |